Mastt vs Provan — Choosing the Right Construction Intelligence Platform for NZ

If you're managing a construction project in New Zealand and researching AI-powered project intelligence, you've probably come across both Mastt and Provan. Both serve the construction sector. Both use AI. But they take fundamentally different approaches to solving different problems. This is an honest comparison to help you decide which fits your project.

At a Glance

Mastt Provan
Founded 2019, Australia 2026, New Zealand
Model SaaS platform (self-service) Advisory + technology service
Primary market Australia / APAC New Zealand
Target users Project owners, real estate developers, capital projects Project owners, developers, PMCs, contractors
AI capabilities Contract review, invoice pre-fill, AI assistant, dashboards Contract intelligence, obligation tracking, risk detection, relationship intelligence
NZS 3910 support No confirmed NZS 3910 coverage Purpose-built for NZS 3910, CCA 2002, Design and Build construction">NZS 3916, FIDIC
Pricing Free tier available + custom enterprise pricing Contact for pricing
Delivery Sign up and use immediately Configured and managed by Provan, with ongoing advisory
Notable clients Australian Department of Defence, Monash University, Super Retail Group NZ-focused client base

Two Different Models

The most important distinction between Mastt and Provan is not the features list. It is the delivery model.

Mastt: SaaS Platform

Mastt is a software-as-a-service platform. You sign up, log in, and use the tools. It is designed for project owners and capital project managers who want dashboards, reporting, AI-assisted contract review, and invoice management in a single platform. The value comes from the software itself. Your team operates it, and the platform handles the data processing and AI features.

This is a proven model. It scales well, it's accessible (there's a free tier), and it puts the tools directly in the hands of your team. If you have experienced contract administrators who know what to look for and just need better tooling, a self-service platform makes sense.

Provan: Advisory + Technology

Provan is an AI-powered intelligent operating system for infrastructure and engineering businesses, covering six domains: Pipeline, Contracts, Projects, People, Finance, and Risk. The system is configured by someone with 10 years of NZS 3910 experience, and the advisory layer is what makes it different from a self-service platform.

Provan configures the system to your specific contracts, maps your obligations, monitors your deadlines, and surfaces the risks your team needs to see. Your professionals still make every decision. The system ensures they see everything they need to see.

This model is more hands-on and more suited to teams that want deep project intelligence without building internal AI capability from scratch.

Key Distinction

Mastt gives your team a platform to work with. Provan gives your team a configured system and an advisory partner to work alongside. Neither approach is inherently better. They solve different problems for different teams.

NZ Compliance: NZS 3910 and CCA Coverage

If you are running a construction project in New Zealand, your contracts are almost certainly governed by NZS 3910 (or NZS 3916 for design and build) and the adjudication, and suspension rights in construction">Construction Contracts Act 2002. These are not optional. They define your obligations, your payment deadlines, and your dispute resolution rights.

Mastt is an Australian-built platform with an APAC focus. Based on publicly available information, there is no confirmed NZS 3910 or CCA 2002 support. Mastt's AI contract review and reporting capabilities are strong, but the specific clause structures of NZS 3910 (the time bars, the Engineer's obligations, the practical completion certification process) require purpose-built logic that generic contract AI may not capture.

Provan was built for construction contracts including NZS 3910, CCA 2002, NZS 3916, and FIDIC. The system understands NZS 3910 clause structures, CCA payment deadlines (including the critical 20-working-day response window), and design obligations under NZS 3916. This is the foundation the entire system is configured around, not a bolted-on feature.

Why This Matters

Missing a CCA payment schedule deadline can turn a disputed amount into an immediately payable debt. Missing a time bar on a variation claim can extinguish your right to recover costs entirely. NZ-specific compliance is not a nice-to-have. It is the difference between a well-managed project and one that is exposed to avoidable risk.

What Mastt Does Well

Credit where it's due. Mastt has built a credible platform with genuine strengths.

What Provan Does Differently

Provan's strengths are in the areas where a pure software platform reaches its limits.

In the interest of honesty, Provan is a newer company. It does not offer a self-service platform or a free tier. The delivery model requires a more committed engagement. If you want to sign up, click around, and figure things out yourself, Provan is not built for that.

When to Choose Mastt

Mastt is likely the better fit if:

When to Choose Provan

Provan is likely the better fit if:

Can You Use Both?

Yes, and for some organisations, that might be the right answer.

Mastt and Provan are not mutually exclusive. They operate at different layers of the project intelligence stack. You could use Mastt for its dashboards, reporting, and executive-facing data visualisation, while using Provan for deep NZS 3910 project intelligence, obligation tracking, and advisory support.

Mastt handles the "what's happening on the project" layer well. Provan handles the "what does the contract require and are we compliant" layer. On a large, complex NZ project, both layers matter.

The Practical View

Don't choose tools based on marketing pages. Choose them based on what your project actually needs. If you need NZ project intelligence, make sure whatever you choose actually understands NZ contracts. If you need dashboards, make sure whatever you choose does dashboards well. Sometimes the answer is both.

SM
Stephen Milner
10 years in NZ construction project management across $10M–$750M projects. Deep expertise in NZS 3910, NZS 3916, FIDIC, CCA 2002, and Design & Build delivery. Former roles with New Zealand’s leading project management consultancies and as part of the SPV team on one of the country’s largest infrastructure PPP projects. Founder of Provan.

Not Sure Which Approach Fits Your Project?

Book a discovery call and we will give you an honest assessment of whether Provan is the right fit, or whether something else would serve you better.

Book a Working Session Or email stephen@provan.ai
Disclaimer

This article provides a practical project management perspective. It is general informational content, not legal advice. For specific guidance on how the principles discussed apply to your project's contractual arrangements, consult the relevant standards, legislation, and your legal advisors.